Legislature(2003 - 2004)
2003-03-05 House Journal
Full Journal pdf2003-03-05 House Journal Page 0403 HB 52 The following, which had been read the second time and held in second reading to today's calendar (page 362), was again before the House: 2003-03-05 House Journal Page 0404 CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 52(JUD) "An Act relating to the forfeiture of property used to possess or distribute child pornography, to commit indecent viewing or photography, to commit a sex offense, or to solicit the commission of, attempt to commit, or conspire to commit possession or distribution of child pornography, indecent viewing or photography, or a sexual offense." Amendment No. 1 was offered by Representative Berkowitz: Page 1, line 1 (title amendment) and Page 2, lines 5 and 16: Delete "property" Insert "instrumentality of a crime" Page 2, line 5: Delete "Property" Insert "Instrumentality of a crime" Page 2, lines 9, 17, and 21: Delete "property" Insert "instrumentality of a crime" Page 2, line 9, following "means": Delete through line 14. Insert "property, other than real property, that contributes directly and materially to the commission of a crime." Representative Berkowitz moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 1 be adopted. Representative McGuire objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 1 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 52(JUD) Second Reading Amendment No. 1 YEAS: 11 NAYS: 27 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 0 VACANT: 1 2003-03-05 House Journal Page 0405 Yeas: Berkowitz, Cissna, Crawford, Gara, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Joule, Kapsner, Kerttula, Kookesh, Moses Nays: Anderson, Chenault, Coghill, Croft, Dahlstrom, Fate, Foster, Gatto, Harris, Hawker, Heinze, Holm, Kohring, Kott, Lynn, Masek, McGuire, Meyer, Morgan, Rokeberg, Samuels, Seaton, Stoltze, Weyhrauch, Williams, Wilson, Wolf Excused: Whitaker And so, Amendment No. 1 was not adopted. Representative Coghill moved and asked unanimous consent that CSHB 52(JUD) be considered engrossed, advanced to third reading, and placed on final passage. There being no objection, it was so ordered. CSHB 52(JUD) was read the third time. The question being: "Shall CSHB 52(JUD) pass the House?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 52(JUD) Third Reading Final Passage YEAS: 37 NAYS: 0 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 1 VACANT: 1 Yeas: Anderson, Berkowitz, Chenault, Cissna, Coghill, Crawford, Croft, Dahlstrom, Fate, Foster, Gara, Gatto, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Harris, Hawker, Heinze, Holm, Joule, Kapsner, Kerttula, Kohring, Kookesh, Kott, Lynn, Masek, McGuire, Meyer, Morgan, Rokeberg, Samuels, Seaton, Stoltze, Weyhrauch, Williams, Wilson, Wolf Excused: Whitaker Absent: Moses And so, CSHB 52(JUD) passed the House and was referred to the Chief Clerk for engrossment.